Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 8 results ...

Ayinla, K O, Cheung, F and Tawil, A (2019) Demystifying the concept of offsite manufacturing method. Construction Innovation , 20(02), 223–46.

Hamidavi, T, Abrishami, S, Ponterosso, P, Begg, D and Nanos, N (2020) OSD. Construction Innovation , 20(02), 149–69.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Optimisation; Structural design; Generative design; Visual Programming (VP); Robot Structural Analysis Professional (RSAP); Building Information Modelling (BIM); Revit autodesk;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1471-4175
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2019-0126
  • Abstract:
    The paper aims to leverage the importance of the integrated automatic structural design for tall buildings at the early stage. It proposes to use an automatic prototype to perform the structural design, analysis and optimisation in a building information modelling (BIM)-based platform. This process starts with extracting the required information from the architectural model in Revit Autodesk, such as boundary conditions and designs different options of the structural models in Robot Autodesk. In this process, Dynamo for Revit is used to define the mathematical functions to use different variables and generate various structural models. The paper aims to expand the domain of automation in the BIM platform to reduce the iterative process in different areas such as conceptual structural design and collaboration between architects and structural engineers to reduce the time and cost at the early stages. Design/methodology/approach The paper begins with an exploratory research by adopting a qualitative methodology and using open-ended questions to achieve more information about the phenomenon of automation and interoperability between structural engineers and architects and gain new insight into this area. Furthermore, correlation research is used by adopting quantitative and short questions to compare the proposed prototype with the traditional process of the structural design and optimisation and the interoperability between architects and engineers and consequently, validate the research. Findings As an outcome of the research, a structural design optimisation (SDO) prototype was developed to semi-automate the structural design process of tall buildings at the early stages. Moreover, the proposed prototype can be used during the early stage of structural design in different areas such as residential buildings, bridges, truss, reinforced concrete detailing, etc. Moreover, comprehensive literature regarding using automation in structural design, optimisation process and interoperability between architects and engineers is conducted that provides a new insight to contribute to future research and development. Research limitations/implications Due to the time limit, the paper results may lack in a comprehensive automatic structural design process. Therefore, the researchers are encouraged to expand the workability of the prototype for a comprehensive automatic design check such as automatic design for the minimum deflection, displacement of different types of buildings. Practical implications The prototype includes implications for the development of different automatic designs. Originality/value The focus of this paper is the optimisation of the structural design in the BIM platform by using automation. This combination is one of the novelties of this paper, and the existing literature has a very limited amount of information and similar work in this area, especially interoperability between architects and engineers.

Khan, M W and Ali, Y (2020) Sustainable construction. Construction Innovation , 20(02), 191–207.

Lenderink, B, Halman, J I, Boes, H and Voordijk, H (2020) A method to encourage and assess innovations in public tenders for infrastructure and construction projects. Construction Innovation , 20(02), 171–89.

Saka, A B and Chan, D W (2020) Profound barriers to building information modelling (BIM) adoption in construction small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Construction Innovation , 20(02), 261–84.

Sergeeva, N and Liu, N (2019) Social construction of innovation and the role of innovation brokers in the construction sector. Construction Innovation , 20(02), 247–59.

Utomo, C and Rahmawati, Y (2020) Agreement options for negotiation on material location decision of housing development. Construction Innovation , 20(02), 209–22.

Van Oorschot, J A, Halman, J I and Hofman, E (2020) Getting innovations adopted in the housing sector. Construction Innovation , 20(02), 285–318.